Navigating the Information Security Landscape: ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2

As cyber threats evolve, so do the standards and frameworks designed to combat them. Two of the most recognized standards in information security are ISO 27001 and SOC 2. What sets them apart, and which one is right for your organization? Let’s delve into the key differences.

Purpose and Scope: Global Framework vs. Client-Centric Assurance

ISO 27001: ISO 27001 offers a comprehensive framework for managing an organization’s information security, applicable to any organization regardless of size or industry. It covers all types of information, from digital data to paper-based records, through a systematic Information Security Management System (ISMS).

SOC 2: SOC 2 is designed for service organizations, particularly those handling client data, to ensure secure data management and protect clients’ interests. It’s tailored for tech and cloud computing companies, focusing on the Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.

Standards and Framework: Comprehensive Controls vs. Prescriptive Criteria

ISO 27001: ISO 27001 is built on a set of controls outlined in Annex A, derived from best practices in information security. It requires organizations to identify and mitigate information security risks, offering versatile tools for managing a wide range of security threats.

SOC 2: SOC 2 is based on the Trust Services Criteria established by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). It focuses on the operational effectiveness of controls related to five criteria over a specified period, addressing specific client-centric security concerns.

Certification vs. Attestation: The Stamp of Approval

ISO 27001: Certification under ISO 27001 involves a rigorous audit by an accredited certification body, valid for three years with annual surveillance audits to ensure ongoing compliance. It’s a globally recognized mark of top-tier information security management.

SOC 2: SOC 2 results in an attestation by an independent CPA firm, culminating in a detailed SOC 2 report. This can be a Type I (point-in-time) or Type II (over a period) attestation, offering insights into the design and effectiveness of your security controls. 

Geographical Recognition: International Acclaim vs. Growing Domestic Fame

ISO 27001: ISO 27001 is recognized and respected worldwide, with organizations globally adopting this standard to demonstrate their commitment to robust information security management.

SOC 2: Initially U.S.-centric, SOC 2 is becoming a go-to standard for service organizations worldwide, appealing particularly to technology companies looking to build trust and credibility.

Approach and Implementation: Process-Based vs. Criteria-Focused

ISO 27001: ISO 27001 emphasizes a process-based approach, requiring detailed risk assessments and systematic risk management. It involves a continuous cycle of improvement, with regular internal audits and management reviews.

SOC 2: SOC 2 focuses on specific controls relevant to the Trust Services Criteria. It’s more straightforward in terms of prescribed controls, emphasizing compliance and operational effectiveness.

Maintenance and Continuous Improvement: Ongoing Vigilance vs. Annual Review

ISO 27001: Maintaining ISO 27001 certification involves continuous monitoring, reviewing, and improving the ISMS. Regular internal audits and management reviews help stay ahead of evolving security threats.

SOC 2: For SOC 2, ongoing compliance with the Trust Services Criteria is key. Organizations typically undergo an annual audit to maintain their SOC 2 report, demonstrating their commitment to protecting client data.

Which one is right for you?

Choosing between ISO 27001 and SOC 2 depends on your organization’s needs. For a comprehensive, internationally recognized framework to manage all types of information security risks, ISO 27001 is ideal. For a service organization focused on assuring clients about data security and privacy, especially one located in the United States, SOC 2’s targeted approach could be the better choice.

Red Sift is ISO 27001 certified and has the SOC 2 Type II attestation. Learn more on our Security & Trust page.

PUBLISHED BY

Francesca Rünger-Field

11 Jul. 2024

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
BIMI

VMC and CMC: What are the new requirements?

Jack Lilley

Executive Summary: Staying updated on Verified Mark Certificates (VMCs) and Certified Mark Certificates (CMCs) is crucial for organizations aiming to authenticate their logos and enhance brand trust in email communications. Discover the key changes in the latest security requirements and compare the differences between VMCs and CMCs.​ This article: Introduction Verified Mark Certificates (VMCs) and…

Read more
BEC

The future of email security: Innovations, challenges, and the role of DMARC

Jack Lilley

Executive summary: Email remains a critical tool for business and personal communication, but it is also a primary target for cyber threats such as phishing, spoofing, and Business Email Compromise. As attackers become more sophisticated, organizations must adopt advanced security measures like DMARC and stay informed about emerging authentication protocols. Industry collaboration and proactive…

Read more
Aviation

Why implementing DMARC is essential for Aviation

Jack Lilley

If you’re in aviation and still haven’t locked down your email security, you’re taking a serious risk. Cyberattacks on airlines, airports, and aerospace companies are up 131% in just one year. Phishing and Business Email Compromise (BEC) scams are hammering the industry, costing millions, causing chaos, and damaging customer trust. Attackers aren’t just targeting…

Read more
News

Red Sift Brand Trust joins Cisco portfolio to extend domain and brand…

Francesca Rünger-Field

Many organizations have implemented email authentication and hardened their owned domains against abuse. But a more exposed and less controlled surface remains: the brand. With the ease and efficiency of AI tools, brand impersonation has become a successful tactic for bypassing technical controls and targeting users directly. While email authentication protocols like DMARC can…

Read more