Navigating the Information Security Landscape: ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2

As cyber threats evolve, so do the standards and frameworks designed to combat them. Two of the most recognized standards in information security are ISO 27001 and SOC 2. What sets them apart, and which one is right for your organization? Let’s delve into the key differences.

Purpose and Scope: Global Framework vs. Client-Centric Assurance

ISO 27001: ISO 27001 offers a comprehensive framework for managing an organization’s information security, applicable to any organization regardless of size or industry. It covers all types of information, from digital data to paper-based records, through a systematic Information Security Management System (ISMS).

SOC 2: SOC 2 is designed for service organizations, particularly those handling client data, to ensure secure data management and protect clients’ interests. It’s tailored for tech and cloud computing companies, focusing on the Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.

Standards and Framework: Comprehensive Controls vs. Prescriptive Criteria

ISO 27001: ISO 27001 is built on a set of controls outlined in Annex A, derived from best practices in information security. It requires organizations to identify and mitigate information security risks, offering versatile tools for managing a wide range of security threats.

SOC 2: SOC 2 is based on the Trust Services Criteria established by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). It focuses on the operational effectiveness of controls related to five criteria over a specified period, addressing specific client-centric security concerns.

Certification vs. Attestation: The Stamp of Approval

ISO 27001: Certification under ISO 27001 involves a rigorous audit by an accredited certification body, valid for three years with annual surveillance audits to ensure ongoing compliance. It’s a globally recognized mark of top-tier information security management.

SOC 2: SOC 2 results in an attestation by an independent CPA firm, culminating in a detailed SOC 2 report. This can be a Type I (point-in-time) or Type II (over a period) attestation, offering insights into the design and effectiveness of your security controls. 

Geographical Recognition: International Acclaim vs. Growing Domestic Fame

ISO 27001: ISO 27001 is recognized and respected worldwide, with organizations globally adopting this standard to demonstrate their commitment to robust information security management.

SOC 2: Initially U.S.-centric, SOC 2 is becoming a go-to standard for service organizations worldwide, appealing particularly to technology companies looking to build trust and credibility.

Approach and Implementation: Process-Based vs. Criteria-Focused

ISO 27001: ISO 27001 emphasizes a process-based approach, requiring detailed risk assessments and systematic risk management. It involves a continuous cycle of improvement, with regular internal audits and management reviews.

SOC 2: SOC 2 focuses on specific controls relevant to the Trust Services Criteria. It’s more straightforward in terms of prescribed controls, emphasizing compliance and operational effectiveness.

Maintenance and Continuous Improvement: Ongoing Vigilance vs. Annual Review

ISO 27001: Maintaining ISO 27001 certification involves continuous monitoring, reviewing, and improving the ISMS. Regular internal audits and management reviews help stay ahead of evolving security threats.

SOC 2: For SOC 2, ongoing compliance with the Trust Services Criteria is key. Organizations typically undergo an annual audit to maintain their SOC 2 report, demonstrating their commitment to protecting client data.

Which one is right for you?

Choosing between ISO 27001 and SOC 2 depends on your organization’s needs. For a comprehensive, internationally recognized framework to manage all types of information security risks, ISO 27001 is ideal. For a service organization focused on assuring clients about data security and privacy, especially one located in the United States, SOC 2’s targeted approach could be the better choice.

Red Sift is ISO 27001 certified and has the SOC 2 Type II attestation. Learn more on our Security & Trust page.

PUBLISHED BY

Francesca Rünger-Field

11 Jul. 2024

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
DMARC

400,000 DMARC boost after Microsoft’s high-volume sender update

Jack Lilley

Microsoft’s decision to join Google and Yahoo in enforcing stricter rules for high-volume senders has triggered an immediate response across the internet. In the last 30 days alone, 406,042 new domains have deployed Domain‑based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC), pushing the global total to 10.9 million. While not all domains will be exclusive Outlook users,…

Read more
DMARC

Red Sift partners with Gradian to strengthen email security through OnDMARC

Jack Lilley

Today Red Sift launches a new partnership with Gradian, a leading data protection provider, to offer its award-winning applications, including Red Sift OnDMARC, to new and existing customers. Established through Red Sift’s relationship with UK distributor E92plus, the two companies look to strengthen defences against phishing and Business Email Compromise (BEC) attacks. Allowing organisations…

Read more
Cybersecurity

DMARCbis: What are the changes and how to be ready

Jack Lilley

Executive Summary: DMARCbis, also known as DMARC 2.0, is the forthcoming update to the DMARC email authentication protocol, designed to address limitations and ambiguities in the original standard, with an expectation to be finalized and published in 2025. The update introduces clearer guidelines, a new method for determining organizational domains, and streamlined record management.…

Read more
Certificates

TLS certificates are changing: What you need to know

Jack Lilley

Executive summary: TLS certificates are about to get significantly shorter-lived. Starting 15 March 2026, newly issued public-trust certificates will max out at 200 days—and just three years later, that lifespan drops to 47 days. Backed by Google, Apple, and Mozilla, this shift aims to make the web safer through fresher data, faster failover, and…

Read more