Universities: rich in knowledge, ripe for cyberattacks

The latest research into the state of cybersecurity defenses across universities in the UK shows some dismal stats. A quarter of universities report daily attacks, meaning that students, staff, and suppliers risk data and monetary theft. 

With freshers’ week a bleary, distant memory, and the autumn semester in full swing, criminals will be busy executing their carefully planned attacks on university students and employees. If you manage anything online, you’re fair game. 

But given the destitute reputation of students and the under-funded institutions, why don’t criminals switch focus to more lucrative organizations in finance, defense, or legal sectors where the payloads are so much higher?

Why target universities?

The most recent figures we could get our hands on suggested the UK university sector contributed £21.5 billion to the national economy. It’s worth more than you thought, right? Not only do universities bring money into our economy from international students, but many have vital roles in the country’s research posture, which in itself is worth a cool £22 million per university. 

That statistic right there is one of the biggest draws to compromising a university’s cybersecurity defenses – 93% of the research conducted at UK universities is commissioned by the government, making that research a point of interest for state-sponsored actors as well as cybercriminals on home soil. We can also assume that some of that research relates to national security, making those research departments a rich source of valuable data. 

So with personal data, intellectual property, and numerous income streams, universities need to be certain they’re defending all points of entry into their networks. 

The weakest link? 

As with any type of organization, universities need to ensure they’re protecting critical data and systems. One easy-to-ignore point of entry is email – most IT teams will reassure you that they have the latest and greatest email gateway protection, but many IT professionals fail to realize that even the tightest email gateway protection will be powerless against emails that purport to come from a legitimate source. 

Imagine you’re a research doctor working on a government-backed project, and the data you manage is GCHQ-level confidential. A colleague sends you an email asking for some of your research to be sent to them – it’s very last minute and very urgent and you haven’t got time to question it, so you attach the files to the email and hit ‘send’. It’s after your Vice Chancellor has been on the phone to your government research sponsor that you find out you’ve had a data breach of gargantuan proportions. How? A criminal impersonated your university’s domain and sent you an email that you believed to be real. 

It doesn’t take a degree… 

Only one form of email defense can stamp out these types of phishing attacks. DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance) ensures that emails are authenticated before they come anywhere near your mailbox, and confirms that they’ve been sent from legitimate sources, blocking impersonated emails from reaching your spam or inbox.

Given DMARC is a government-backed tool, you’d assume most higher education institutions would have it in place to protect its students, staff, visitors and partners. So we checked. In 2019, we analysed the DMARC records of 172 higher education institutions in the UK, and found that 63% of universities didn’t have the protocol in place and were inadvertently putting users at risk of email fraud. The only good news from this research is that these figures were an improvement from our findings in 2017, when only 13% of the same institutions were using DMARC. 

The long-term damage from a breach goes beyond losing student funds or confidential data. It severely impacts the organization’s reputation – in the case of a university, this could lead to a major drop in funding, a stagnation in research, or worse still, state-sponsored attacks on related government agencies. 

If you want to find out more about the threat of cyberattacks in the education sector, the NCSC has recently published this report. And we’re a friendly bunch here too, so drop us a note to see if we can help you navigate your email impersonation.

PUBLISHED BY

Clare Holmes

22 Oct. 2019

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
News

Microsoft announces new email requirements for bulk senders

Red Sift

Microsoft has officially announced new authentication requirements for bulk email senders, aligning with the policies rolled out in 2024 by Google and Yahoo. These changes aim to improve email security and deliverability for Outlook.com users, covering domains like outlook.com, hotmail.com, and live.com. The update marks a significant shift as Microsoft moves to require SPF,…

Read more
DMARC

From concept to market leader: Reflecting on the development of Red Sift…

Rahul Powar

Following Red Sift OnDMARC being featured in 18 reports in G2’s Spring 2025 Report, CEO Rahul Powar shares his thoughts on the innovation behind the product—and what’s driving its continued momentum in the fight against phishing and Business Email Compromise (BEC). When I founded Red Sift, my goal was to make proactive cybersecurity accessible…

Read more
DMARC

Keep your Microsoft Online Email Routing Address secure with Red Sift OnDMARC

Faisal Misle

Every Microsoft 365 tenant includes a default domain in the format tenantname.onmicrosoft.com. This is known as the Microsoft Online Email Routing Address (MOERA). What many don’t realize is that attackers have started using these domains to impersonate organizations in phishing attacks. If left unmonitored, MOERA domains can become a blind spot in your email…

Read more
News

Red Sift OnDMARC ranked #1 in EMEA and Europe for DMARC in…

Francesca Rünger-Field

G2’s Spring 2025 Report is here, and we’ve got some exciting news to share! Red Sift OnDMARC has been named the #1-rated DMARC solution in both EMEA and Europe, and that’s just the start. We also took the #1 spot in the Mid-Market Results Index and Mid-Market Usability Index, and were featured in 18…

Read more