• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Red Sift Blog

Democratizing technology essential for cybersecurity.

Red Sift Blog
  • redsift.com
  • Featured
  • About
  • Get in touch
You are here: Home / Email / Deliverability / Taking one step forward and two steps back with the spam problem

Taking one step forward and two steps back with the spam problem

by clare
November 27, 2017July 27, 2018Filed under:
  • Deliverability
  • Email

Just as it seems we’re getting a handle on soaring levels of spam emails a key tool is changed for the worse

By the end of Q3 this year, just under 60% of email was deemed spam. That’s almost two in every three emails being a nuisance, or potentially dangerous to global email users. Businesses really don’t want to contribute to the problem by creating “noise” in people’s inboxes, instead we want to focus on improving deliverability and ensuring our customers receive relevant communications from us.

Most companies, and in particular marketers, rely on bulk email services to manage the distribution of our email messages, and until now, we’ve had one provider in our corner, doing its best to reduce unnecessary emails flying about the internet.

Monkeying around with email

However, in October, MailChimp, had a change of heart about its opt-in settings for subscribing to emails, moving from a double opt-in process, to a single.

So what does this mean? By changing subscription settings to a default single opt-in, a person now only needs to enter an email address and click subscribe to join a MailChimp list. Compare this to the double opt-in method — where a subscriber had to verify they wanted to subscribe via responding to one-off email they received — and you can see why “spam” email volumes may quickly increase.

The omnipresent GDPR

Needless to say by removing this verification process, people weren’t happy. Double opt-in is a necessity to prove consent was actually obtained from an email address owner under the upcoming GDPR regulations. MailChimp’s change provides an array of possibilities for hackers and bots to easily access newsletter subscriber lists, meaning you could see hundreds of new emails in your inbox daily. Facing backlash in Europe specifically, the company decided that if the primary contact address was in the EU then existing forms would remain double opt-in. Great news for .co.uk email addresses, but what about users of Gmail where it’s difficult to determine location?

An e-mail u-turn

The incident brings to light the ever present dangers facing email security today, as well as the battle that so many brands face with email deliverability. MailChimp argued that double opt-in rates have slipped to 39% and that consumers no longer expect this step. While this may be true, the industry trend hurts privacy and security and goes against what the service had previously stated about the importance of authentication.

It wasn’t so long ago that MailChimp lauded double opt-in as a safeguard against bots, scammers and everything in between. This new default behavior does quite the opposite, and although opt-in will increase in the short term, longer term organisations using MailChimp will likely face an increased number of people unsubscribing from email lists. Furthermore, we’re likely to see spam rates soar as a consequence. Single opt-in enables spam bots to plug your email address into any number of sign-up lists and and in effect, DDoS your mailbox.

There’s very little that users and security advocates can do about this — taking a corporate stand and dropping the email provider is one option, but in an industry where double opt-in is a rare practice, how easy is this option? We’d love to hear your thoughts on the MailChimp saga, or indeed any spam-related news — team@ondmarc.com.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Tagged:
  • Cybersecurity
  • DMARC
  • Email
  • Email Marketing
  • Spam

Post navigation

Previous Post Award: Winner of Anti-Phishing Solution of the Year 2017
Next Post Should you ever DIY cyber security?

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • 2021 The Threat Landscape: Brand protection and BEC attacks lead the charge
  • OnDMARC Wins “Best-Of DMARC” Award On Review Platform Expert Insights
  • The case for embracing DORA
  • Red Sift – Closing the Net on the Phishing Problem
  • Beware of this common NHS Covid-19 Vaccine email scam

Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • February 2016

Categories

  • AI
  • BEC
  • Coronavirus
  • Cybersecurity
  • Deliverability
  • DMARC
  • Email
  • Finance
  • Labs
  • News
  • OnINBOX
  • Partner Program
  • Red Sift Tools
  • Uncategorized
  • Work @ Red Sift

Copyright © 2021 · Milan Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in