Taking one step forward and two steps back with the spam problem

Just as it seems we’re getting a handle on soaring levels of spam emails a key tool is changed for the worse

By the end of Q3 this year, just under 60% of email was deemed spam. That’s almost two in every three emails being a nuisance, or potentially dangerous to global email users. Businesses really don’t want to contribute to the problem by creating “noise” in people’s inboxes, instead we want to focus on improving deliverability and ensuring our customers receive relevant communications from us.

Most companies, and in particular marketers, rely on bulk email services to manage the distribution of our email messages, and until now, we’ve had one provider in our corner, doing its best to reduce unnecessary emails flying about the internet.

Monkeying around with email

However, in October, MailChimp, had a change of heart about its opt-in settings for subscribing to emails, moving from a double opt-in process, to a single.

So what does this mean? By changing subscription settings to a default single opt-in, a person now only needs to enter an email address and click subscribe to join a MailChimp list. Compare this to the double opt-in method — where a subscriber had to verify they wanted to subscribe via responding to one-off email they received — and you can see why “spam” email volumes may quickly increase.

The omnipresent GDPR

Needless to say by removing this verification process, people weren’t happy. Double opt-in is a necessity to prove consent was actually obtained from an email address owner under the upcoming GDPR regulations. MailChimp’s change provides an array of possibilities for hackers and bots to easily access newsletter subscriber lists, meaning you could see hundreds of new emails in your inbox daily. Facing backlash in Europe specifically, the company decided that if the primary contact address was in the EU then existing forms would remain double opt-in. Great news for .co.uk email addresses, but what about users of Gmail where it’s difficult to determine location?

An e-mail u-turn

The incident brings to light the ever present dangers facing email security today, as well as the battle that so many brands face with email deliverability. MailChimp argued that double opt-in rates have slipped to 39% and that consumers no longer expect this step. While this may be true, the industry trend hurts privacy and security and goes against what the service had previously stated about the importance of authentication.

It wasn’t so long ago that MailChimp lauded double opt-in as a safeguard against bots, scammers and everything in between. This new default behavior does quite the opposite, and although opt-in will increase in the short term, longer term organisations using MailChimp will likely face an increased number of people unsubscribing from email lists. Furthermore, we’re likely to see spam rates soar as a consequence. Single opt-in enables spam bots to plug your email address into any number of sign-up lists and and in effect, DDoS your mailbox.

There’s very little that users and security advocates can do about this — taking a corporate stand and dropping the email provider is one option, but in an industry where double opt-in is a rare practice, how easy is this option? We’d love to hear your thoughts on the MailChimp saga, or indeed any spam-related news — team@ondmarc.com.

PUBLISHED BY

Red Sift

27 Nov. 2017

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
Finance

41% of top Fintech companies are vulnerable to email phishing

Jack Lilley

Only 26% of leading Fintechs enforce DMARC at p=reject, the strongest protection against spoofing by bad actors. Phishing remains a top driver of breaches and fraud. Financial services are a prime target because email moves money, resets passwords, and confirms identity. Verizon’s 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report again lists social engineering and phishing among…

Read more
Certificates

New in Certificates Lite: Active certificate scanning and smarter expiry alerts

Francesca Rünger-Field

A quick recap Earlier this year, we launched Red Sift Certificates Lite, the free TLS certificate expiration monitoring service recommended by Let’s Encrypt. Since launch, thousands of organizations have adopted it to track their certificates and avoid expiry-related outages. What we heard from customers At launch, we had adopted Let’s Encrypt’s approach for consistency…

Read more
AI

Red Sift’s AI Agent, Part II: Optimization for accuracy and scale

Phong Nguyen

In our previous blog post, we introduced Red Sift’s AI Agent for lookalike classification – an intelligent system that determines whether a suspicious domain has been deliberately crafted to mimic a legitimate one or if the resemblance is merely coincidental. That post focused on the what and why of the solution: why rule-based automation…

Read more
Brand Protection

Separating signal from noise when fighting brand spoofing

Rahul Powar

“Alert fatigue” must be the most common malady among cybersecurity professionals. According to a recent survey, 56% of large companies handle 1,000+ alerts each day. For 70% of security professionals, the volume of alerts has doubled in the past few years, with more than 51% of campaigns involving some form of AI-generated brand spoofing.…

Read more