Infosecurity Europe 2019: A-listers still failing to protect their domains

The elaborate stands have been dismantled, the armies of exhibitors have headed back to their respective offices and homes, and we can all breathe a sigh of ‘thank-goodness-it’s-over-for-another-year’ relief. But we’re left dumbfounded, yet again, that so many shining stars of the cybersec industry are stumped by DMARC implementation.

Let’s cut to the chase – last year, we decided to analyse the primary domains of the organisations exhibiting at 2018 Infosecurity Europe. This show hosts the crème de la crème of the cybersecurity industry, beacons of hope against the onslaught of data-thieving cyber attacks (bear with the hyperbole, I’m trying to make a point..) so we weren’t expecting the inadequate results that we uncovered.

In 2018, only 9% of those vendors claiming to solve your cybersecurity woes and offering the best of class protection on the market, had protected their own domains with DMARC at a level sufficient to stop phishing attacks at the gateway or sweep to the spam folder. And just to remind you, DMARC is the only surefire way to stamp out email impersonation – email impersonation which enables scammers to send you phishing emails – phishing emails that can dupe you into handing over data, money, confidential details about your SoC… just saying.

But wait, there is good news! We ran the research again this year, and can reveal an improvement – disappointingly, it was a very small increase, just 13% of 2019’s exhibitors had DMARC set at the p=quarantine or p=reject levels.

So, what does this research tell us, apart from the industry is painfully slow at responding to ratified global protocols?

  • DMARC is available to anyone – so if the industry pioneers aren’t implementing it, either hubris is setting in, or it’s proving more complicated than expected to configure it correctly
  • We shouldn’t trust security vendors because they say they’re cybersec geniuses – if they can’t protect their own, known domains, how can they protect your unknown digital infrastructure?
  • DMARC alone can’t protect your networks from intrusion or scammers exploiting vulnerabilities, but it is one of the layers of protection required to prevent phishing attacks – one of the biggest threats to any organisation in today’s age of digital comms.

If you are looking for support with DMARC deployment or simply want to find out more information about how to stop email spoofing, make sure you sign up to our OnDMARC trial for free!

PUBLISHED BY

Red Sift

12 Jun. 2019

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
AI

Staying ahead of AI-powered brand impersonation

Rahul Powar

Executive summary: AI has supercharged brand impersonation, with Q2 2024 seeing nearly half of all processed emails containing spoofing or phishing attempts—40% of which were AI-generated. The scale, speed, and sophistication of these attacks are overwhelming security teams, draining resources on false positives, and leaving critical threats undetected. Consumers are unforgiving when trust is…

Read more
BEC

What is email spoofing and how can you prevent it?

Faisal Misle

Executive summary: Email spoofing is a growing cyber threat where attackers forge the sender’s address to impersonate trusted sources, enabling phishing, business email compromise, and financial fraud. Because legacy email protocols like SMTP lack strong authentication, spoofing can bypass traditional filters. Organizations can mitigate this risk by implementing robust email authentication measures, especially DMARC.…

Read more
Email

What is social engineering and how can you prevent it?

Jack Lilley

Executive summary: Email phishing has evolved and criminals now use social engineering to impersonate executives, suppliers, and even government agencies, persuading recipients to approve payments or disclose credentials. Because human judgment sits at the heart of these attacks, technical controls that eliminate spoofed messages before they reach the inbox are essential. DMARC provides that…

Read more
Cybersecurity

Attackers are abusing Microsoft 365: Here’s how to stay protected

Jack Lilley

Executive summary: Varonis has surfaced an active phishing campaign that spoofs internal users by abusing Microsoft 365’s Direct Send feature. Because Direct Send doesn’t require authentication and is treated as “internal,” these messages often bypass the checks you rely on for outside mail. Microsoft now offers an opt-in switch, RejectDirectSend, to block the pathway,…

Read more