Cybersecurity: from Cost Center to Strategic Investment

Once seen as a cost center, cybersecurity is increasingly understood as a business driver and strategic investment.  Both external and internal forces are at work. The pace and audaciousness of cybercrime, increasingly brazen intellectual property theft (which IBM estimates cost business $4.35 million per breach), and the actions of a few nations have much to do with the changes now underway.

It’s not simply the quantity, but also the quality of cyberattacks and the effect on the bottom line that has made cyber liability emerge as a critical concern for executives. And when it comes to dealing with risk, cybersecurity insurance can’t do it alone. There are now evolving sets of best practices that executives must engage with.

In the wake of a series of high profile breaches, shareholder lawsuits have become more commonplace as parties seek to recover for losses following cyber attacks. These lawsuits very often are smartly keyed into attacks that were either reasonably foreseeable or, once known to leadership, mismanaged. 

Consider that just in the last six months alone we learned that SolarWinds has agreed to pay $26 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit following the massive breach they, and their clients, suffered in 2020. Coming fast on the heels of that settlement, Solarwinds is also expecting to be hit with an enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). 

Attacks against critical infrastructure have become a feature of today’s news and national cybersecurity strategies are taking such attacks into account. In the United States, cybercrime against critical infrastructure is now judged a threat to national security. Organizations are on the hook to improve their cybersecurity posture, with mandates coming in fast. 

Just last March, the SEC announced proposed rules on cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance, and incident disclosure. The rules are meant to address concerns of increasingly significant cybersecurity hazards for public companies. 

Among the key elements, the proposed rules would require public companies to disclose material cybersecurity risks and incidents. The SEC stated that “materiality” for purposes of the proposed rules would be consistent with applicable case law and precedents. Further, publicly traded companies would be required to report cybersecurity incidents on Form 8-K within four days of determining that the incident is material.

With these rapid changes top of mind for executives and boards, cybersecurity should be embedded into everything that we do and organizations will be challenged to plan and prepare, regularly reporting and continuously monitoring risks. Are you ready?

PUBLISHED BY

Sean Costigan

28 Mar. 2023

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
Cybersecurity

Strengthening U.S. political campaigns against cyber threats: The urgent need for DMARC…

Sean Costigan

Securing political campaigns from cyber threats has never been more urgent. It is critical to secure communications that handle sensitive exchanges with voters, contributors, donations and coordinate complex operations. Campaigns make exceptionally rich targets for cyber espionage and exploitation, with our open-source research, demonstrating nearly 75% of US Senate campaign websites having not achieved…

Read more
Certificates

Apple & Chrome propose reduced certificate lifetime

Jack Lilley

The lifetime of SSL/ TLS certificates continues to grow shorter. Chrome initially proposed reducing certificate lifespans to 90 days to enhance security and mitigate risks associated with compromised certificates. Apple took this initiative further, proposing a draft ballot to shorten the maximum validity period for public SSL/TLS certificates to just 45 days by 2027.…

Read more
AI

Skill up your security: How defenders can harness AI

Jack Lilley

How can defenders identify and resolve security issues faster with Red Sift Radar, and what does it have to do with the movie Tenet? That was the key theme of this year’s 16th e-Crimes & Cybersecurity Mid-Year Summit education session, featuring Billy McDiarmid. If you missed the event, don’t worry—we’ve got you covered with…

Read more
Cybersecurity

Behind the Screens: North Korea’s Focus on DMARC in Email Espionage

Sean Costigan

If you missed our recent virtual fireside chat “Behind the Screens: North Korea’s Focus on DMARC in Email Espionage,” or couldn’t attend due to geographical restrictions, we’ve got you covered.  Joined by cybersecurity experts from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Stanford University, together with Red Sift, the session explored how the North…

Read more