Cybersecurity: from Cost Center to Strategic Investment

Once seen as a cost center, cybersecurity is increasingly understood as a business driver and strategic investment.  Both external and internal forces are at work. The pace and audaciousness of cybercrime, increasingly brazen intellectual property theft (which IBM estimates cost business $4.35 million per breach), and the actions of a few nations have much to do with the changes now underway.

It’s not simply the quantity, but also the quality of cyberattacks and the effect on the bottom line that has made cyber liability emerge as a critical concern for executives. And when it comes to dealing with risk, cybersecurity insurance can’t do it alone. There are now evolving sets of best practices that executives must engage with.

In the wake of a series of high profile breaches, shareholder lawsuits have become more commonplace as parties seek to recover for losses following cyber attacks. These lawsuits very often are smartly keyed into attacks that were either reasonably foreseeable or, once known to leadership, mismanaged. 

Consider that just in the last six months alone we learned that SolarWinds has agreed to pay $26 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit following the massive breach they, and their clients, suffered in 2020. Coming fast on the heels of that settlement, Solarwinds is also expecting to be hit with an enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). 

Attacks against critical infrastructure have become a feature of today’s news and national cybersecurity strategies are taking such attacks into account. In the United States, cybercrime against critical infrastructure is now judged a threat to national security. Organizations are on the hook to improve their cybersecurity posture, with mandates coming in fast. 

Just last March, the SEC announced proposed rules on cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance, and incident disclosure. The rules are meant to address concerns of increasingly significant cybersecurity hazards for public companies. 

Among the key elements, the proposed rules would require public companies to disclose material cybersecurity risks and incidents. The SEC stated that “materiality” for purposes of the proposed rules would be consistent with applicable case law and precedents. Further, publicly traded companies would be required to report cybersecurity incidents on Form 8-K within four days of determining that the incident is material.

With these rapid changes top of mind for executives and boards, cybersecurity should be embedded into everything that we do and organizations will be challenged to plan and prepare, regularly reporting and continuously monitoring risks. Are you ready?

PUBLISHED BY

Sean Costigan

28 Mar. 2023

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
News

Introducing DNS Guardian: Stop impersonation and spam caused by domain takeovers 

Rahul Powar

tl;dr: We’re thrilled to announce DNS Guardian — a new feature in Red Sift OnDMARC that can swiftly identify and stop domain takeovers that lead to malicious mail. Back in February, we shared updates with the community about SubdoMailing – an attack discovered by Guardio Labs. The attack was a form of subdomain takeover,…

Read more
Email

“What’s Next for DMARC”: Red Sift & Inbox Monster Webinar Recap

Red Sift

The recent webinar hosted by Inbox Monster, “What’s Next for DMARC: Data & Predictions for a New Era in Email Authentication,” featured insights from Red Sift and examined the significant changes brought by Yahoo and Google’s bulk sender requirements earlier this year.  It also offered a forward-looking perspective on the future of email authentication.…

Read more
Security

Navigating the Information Security Landscape: ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2

Red Sift

As cyber threats evolve, so do the standards and frameworks designed to combat them. Two of the most recognized standards in information security are ISO 27001 and SOC 2. What sets them apart, and which one is right for your organization? Let’s delve into the key differences. Purpose and Scope: Global Framework vs. Client-Centric…

Read more
News

G2 Summer 2024 Report: Red Sift OnDMARC’s Winning Streak Continues

Francesca Rünger-Field

We’re delighted to announce that Red Sift OnDMARC has again been named a Leader in G2’s DMARC category for Summer 2024. This recognition is based on our high Customer Satisfaction scores and strong market presence. Red Sift appeared in 11 reports – 5 new ones since Spring 2024! – earning 5 badges: A few…

Read more
News

Google will no longer trust Entrust certificates from October 2024

Red Sift

Tl;dr: Google has announced that as of October 31, 2024, Chrome will no longer trust certificates signed by Entrust root certificates. While there is no immediate impact on existing certificates or those issued before 31st October 2024, organizations should start reviewing their estate now. On Thursday 27th June 2024, Google announced that it had…

Read more