Padlock credit cards

How do challenger banks compare on cybersecurity

Few sectors have suffered more reputational damage over the past decade than banking (unless you count politics as a sector). The global financial crisis led to a nadir in public trust for some of the most well-known private institutions in the UK. Since then it has been an uphill battle for reputational recovery, not helped by a plethora of high-profile cybersecurity catastrophes that have at some point, embroiled almost every major banking organization.

For example, financial services companies in the UK saw a fivefold rise in data breaches in 2018 alone, with seven UK retail banks, including Santander, Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays, and Tesco Bank, having to limit or shut down their systems due to attack.

The traditional banking sector has struggled to keep pace with the changing cyber threat landscape, in large part due to its ongoing reliance upon vast, sprawling and often archaic global IT systems. No wonder that confidence in the traditional banking sector continues to flounder, with myriad challenger banks and alternative financial services providers now making rapid inroads into previously impenetrable customer bases.

What does this mean for cybersecurity?

In terms of cybersecurity, the change in landscape is either very good or very bad news, depending upon your perspective. On the one hand, these are the ideal conditions for challenger banks to up the ante on cybersecurity, building new systems from the ground up and factoring in the likely threat impact as part of the product innovation process. On the other, there’s the risk that as challenger banks move forward at breakneck pace with their digital service innovations, they fail to give heed to basic security precautions and/or deliver disruptions that bring unintended security consequences.

So we thought we’d take a quick peek at the security defenses of the biggest UK banks – both traditional institutions and challenger banks – to see how many of them have shored up their defenses against one of the most basic yet prevalent threats to their day-to-day customer-facing operations: email fraud.

The DMARC check

One way to assess the strength of an organization’s defenses against email fraud is by checking its domains for evidence of DMARC. DMARC is an email protocol that helps prevent fraudulent emails from reaching customers’ inboxes by snuffing out hackers’ ability to spoof legitimate email domains, instead forcing them to rely on misspelled sender addresses that are far easier to recognize as fake.

As it turns out, the majority of traditional banks are able to show us their DMARC chops, with 92% of them partially or fully implementing everyone’s favorite email fraud prevention protocol. In contrast, a worrying 33% of the UK’s leading challenger banks currently lack DMARC in any capacity.

What does this mean for security?

This is pretty basic stuff – DMARC is one of the essential security measures advocated by the government and increasingly recognized the world over as the only surefire way to prevent email spoofing. To see such a high number of alternative financial services providers overlooking DMARC raises alarm bells. And it is not the only incidence of cybersecurity taking a back seat.

Metro Bank’s hack attack shows that even the promise of additional security measures can backfire if the consequences are not properly considered. Monzo’s introduction of link-based payments has drawn much scorn from the security community for making it far easier for hackers to target their customers with malicious email links.

Given the extent of the industry’s prior security crises, the great hope for the financial services sector is that the raft of new, privacy and security conscious providers force traditional institutions to up their security game. To date there’s been little evidence of this, and this simply has to change in the next few years. Challenger banks must think about how to bake security fully into their innovation processes as well as making 100% sure they have adopted all of the basic ‘no brainer’ security steps, or they’ll forever struggle to be perceived as credible alternatives.

To read the finer details of the research paper, make sure to check out the original piece published in Computer Weekly.

If you’re reading this article in a professional capacity, why not take the first steps towards better email security by getting your free DMARC, SPF, and DKIM health check today?

Check email DMARC setup

PUBLISHED BY

Red Sift

30 May. 2019

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
Certificates

TLS certificates are changing: What you need to know

Red Sift

Executive summary: TLS certificates are about to get significantly shorter-lived. Starting 15 March 2026, newly issued public-trust certificates will max out at 200 days—and just three years later, that lifespan drops to 47 days. Backed by Google, Apple, and Mozilla, this shift aims to make the web safer through fresher data, faster failover, and…

Read more
DKIM

The hidden threat: How misconfigured DKIM enables replay attacks

Red Sift

Email authentication isn’t just an IT concern. It protects your brand and customers. A single misstep can let attackers spoof your domain, send phishing emails, and destroy customer trust. One of the most dangerous methods? The DKIM replay attack. In this post, we’ll break down how undersigned DKIM keys and related misconfigurations open your…

Read more
BIMI

Why DMARC and BIMI are a business priority

Jack Lilley

Email threats aren’t slowing down, and neither should your authentication strategy. In our recent joint webinar with Marigold, “From DMARC to BIMI: Navigating the New Email Authorization Landscape,” we broke down what today’s evolving standards mean for both security and marketing teams—and how to take action now with our free Red Sift Investigate tool.…

Read more
ASM

Zoom stops zooming: Why active monitoring is essential

Billy McDiarmid

​On April 16, 2025, Zoom experienced a significant global outage that disrupted video conferencing services and access to its website for thousands of users, as well as their corporate email for all their employees. It was quickly identified as a domain name registration status problem. Despite being a critical name for Zoom, somehow, the…

Read more