Apple & Chrome propose reduced certificate lifetime

The lifetime of SSL/ TLS certificates continues to grow shorter. Chrome initially proposed reducing certificate lifespans to 90 days to enhance security and mitigate risks associated with compromised certificates. Apple took this initiative further, proposing a draft ballot to shorten the maximum validity period for public SSL/TLS certificates to just 47 days by 2028.

The move is expected to make a significant impact on digital security by pushing for even stricter measures to ensure the authenticity and safety of certificates. It could also reshape industry standards for certificate management, and if rumors are true, other prominent internet providers may support further efforts to reduce certificate lifespans.

The announcement adds to a series of ecosystem changes that teams are already navigating, such as Entrust distrust and the upcoming PCI-DSS 4 mandate

The downside of lifespan reduction

A rapidly expanding digital ecosystem brings the challenge of managing ongoing changes, not to mention the significant increase to certificate management by a staggering eightfold (up from x4 increase by Google). By reducing certification lifespans to just 47 days, Apple has significantly increased the pressure on security teams already concerned with Google’s 90-day limit.

In addition, existing automation tools could lead to workflow failure, with end-to-end processes missing certificates that need to be replaced. This includes an increased risk of mismanagement, leading to certificate expiry and costly service downtime alongside reputational damage. 

What benefits are expected?

It’s not all doom and gloom, as shorter certificate lifetimes come with strong advantages. Organizations will be better equipped to keep pace with changes in the ecosystem, especially as we move toward Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). A shorter life cycle promotes better security hygiene by encouraging more automation, resulting in frequent key rotations. This means compromised assets can be swiftly replaced, helping with revocations and reducing overall risk.

Reducing certificate lifetime will also lead to enhanced security, shortening the window for attackers to exploit compromised certificates. In larger organizations, automation is expected to grow, particularly through the use of AI to manage the volume of certificates in rotation. This shift reduces the potential of human error leading to tighter cybersecurity overall. 

Let Red Sift Certificates support you

At Red Sift, we understand the pain that comes with new updates and the pressure on your organization to adapt. Our Red Sift Certificates application continuously ingests and monitors every public certificate issued, tracking real-time changes to provide comprehensive oversight and immediate alerts for potential security risks.

Preventing downtime from expired or misconfigured certificates will be critical to an organization’s risk management. While options for mitigation through cloud provider tools or certificate authorities exist, automation isn’t foolproof. Red Sift Certificates provides a more comprehensive solution, offering complete discovery, expiration monitoring, and configuration checks—all in one package. This level of visibility and control is something that other solutions simply can’t match.

Chrome and Apple may have fired the starting gun on the reduction of certificate lifetimes, but Red Sift is here to ensure you win the race. Reduce the pressure to adapt by adopting Red Sift Certificates and streamline your organization’s certification management. By automating your inventory, you can prevent misuse, avoid downtime and stay compliant—speak to the Red Sift team today.

PUBLISHED BY

Jack Lilley

22 Oct. 2024

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
BIMI

VMC and CMC: What are the new requirements?

Jack Lilley

Executive Summary: Staying updated on Verified Mark Certificates (VMCs) and Certified Mark Certificates (CMCs) is crucial for organizations aiming to authenticate their logos and enhance brand trust in email communications. Discover the key changes in the latest security requirements and compare the differences between VMCs and CMCs.​ This article: Introduction Verified Mark Certificates (VMCs) and…

Read more
BEC

The future of email security: Innovations, challenges, and the role of DMARC

Jack Lilley

Executive summary: Email remains a critical tool for business and personal communication, but it is also a primary target for cyber threats such as phishing, spoofing, and Business Email Compromise. As attackers become more sophisticated, organizations must adopt advanced security measures like DMARC and stay informed about emerging authentication protocols. Industry collaboration and proactive…

Read more
Aviation

Why implementing DMARC is essential for Aviation

Jack Lilley

If you’re in aviation and still haven’t locked down your email security, you’re taking a serious risk. Cyberattacks on airlines, airports, and aerospace companies are up 131% in just one year. Phishing and Business Email Compromise (BEC) scams are hammering the industry, costing millions, causing chaos, and damaging customer trust. Attackers aren’t just targeting…

Read more
News

Red Sift Brand Trust joins Cisco portfolio to extend domain and brand…

Francesca Rünger-Field

Many organizations have implemented email authentication and hardened their owned domains against abuse. But a more exposed and less controlled surface remains: the brand. With the ease and efficiency of AI tools, brand impersonation has become a successful tactic for bypassing technical controls and targeting users directly. While email authentication protocols like DMARC can…

Read more