BreakSPF: How to mitigate the attack

Executive Summary: BreakSPF is an emerging threat that takes advantage of misconfigured SPF records, especially those with overly broad IP ranges. Attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities to send fraudulent emails that appear legitimate.Utilizing solutions like Red Sift OnDMARC can help organizations detect and correct these misconfigurations, enhancing their overall email security posture.​

This article:

  • Introduces BreakSPF, an attack framework that exploits misconfigurations in the Sender Policy Framework (SPF), particularly overly permissive IP ranges.​
  • Explains how attackers leverage shared infrastructures like cloud providers and content delivery networks (CDNs) to bypass SPF checks and send spoofed emails.
  • ​Highlights the importance of using tools like Red Sift OnDMARC to identify and resolve over-permissive SPF configurations, thereby strengthening email security.​

Introduction

BreakSPF is a newly identified attack framework that exploits misconfigurations in the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) a widely used email authentication protocol. A common misconfiguration involves overly permissive IP ranges, where SPF records allow large blocks of IP addresses to send emails on behalf of a domain. These ranges often include shared infrastructures like cloud providers, proxies, or content delivery networks (CDNs). 

BreakSPF capitalizes on this by identifying and abusing such configurations, enabling attackers to bypass SPF checks, send spoofed emails that appear legitimate, and manipulate shared services to evade detection.

BreakSPF attack types

BreakSPF uses three primary forms of attack to exploit SPF vulnerabilities, targeting both HTTP and SMTP servers. These include:

  1. Fixed IP address attacks

In this method, attackers gain long-term control over specific IP addresses, using them as Mail Transfer Agents (MTAs) to send spoofed emails. By leveraging shared infrastructure like cloud servers and proxies, they bypass traditional defenses such as greylisting.

  1. Dynamic IP address attacks

Here, attackers dynamically assess vulnerable domains by monitoring changing outgoing IPs, exploiting them temporarily. This method relies on public infrastructure like serverless functions or CI/CD platforms, making traditional IP blacklisting ineffective. Unlike fixed IP attacks, it avoids reliance on specific IP addresses, increasing complexity and making them more challenging to mitigate.

  1. Cross-protocol attacks

In cross-protocol attacks, hackers embed SMTP data within HTTP packets and use HTTP proxies or CDN exit nodes to forward them to victims. By exploiting shared infrastructures like open HTTP proxies and CDN services, these attacks blend malicious activity with legitimate traffic, making them exceptionally stealthy and difficult to trace.

Misconceptions about SPF that weaken email security

A common misconception about SPF is that it authenticates the visible “From” address seen in email clients. In reality, it verifies the 5321.MailFrom address, also known as the return path or bounce address, only visible in the email headers.

This misunderstanding often leads organizations to incorrectly add every every-sending tool to their SPF records. Email expert Laura Atkins from Word to the Wise explains it well: “One of the errors comes because a lot of folks, even a lot of email experts, don’t always know or remember that there are two separate yet equally important From: addresses in an email.”

SPF should only include mechanisms for messages using your organizational domain in the return path. If a subdomain or a different domain is used in the return path, there’s no need to add it to your main domain’s SPF record since it won’t be checked. Including unnecessary mechanisms wastes valuable SPF lookup space.

Protect against BreakSPF with Red Sift OnDMARC

BreakSPF exploits overly permissive SPF ranges, allowing attackers to bypass DMARC and send malicious emails that appear authenticated. To counter this, it’s essential to review not just failing sources but also passing sources that seem unfamiliar or suspicious.

Red Sift OnDMARC’s Dynamic SPF feature safeguards your domain by continuously analyzing SPF records to identify and resolve over-permissive ranges. This proactive approach helps improve your security posture and reduce your attack surface, ensuring potential vulnerabilities exploited by BreakSPF are addressed before any damage occurs. OnDMARC also detects and fixes gaps in protocol misconfiguration, providing comprehensive protection.

OnDMARC users also benefit from optimized forensic reporting for continuous monitoring across domains and subdomains, including the detection of suspicious IP addresses. Additionally, the Dynamic SPF feature prevents issues with the 10 DNS lookup limit by consolidating all authorized services into a single dynamic include statement. This ensures SPF validation for all legitimate traffic, regardless of the number of sending services used.

Stay ahead of threats like BreakSPFstart your free trial with Red Sift OnDMARC today!

PUBLISHED BY

Jack Lilley

28 Nov. 2024

SHARE ARTICLE:

Categories

Recent Posts

VIEW ALL
AI

Red Sift’s AI Agent, Part III: Performance in Action

Phong Nguyen

This is the third article in our AI Agent series. In Part 1, we introduced Red Sift’s AI Agent for lookalike classification – an intelligent solution for handling the ambiguous cases that rule-based automation can’t confidently resolve, offering analyst-grade triage autonomously. In Part 2, we took readers behind the scenes to explore the engineering…

Read more
Finance

41% of top Fintech companies are vulnerable to email phishing

Jack Lilley

Only 26% of leading Fintechs enforce DMARC at p=reject, the strongest protection against spoofing by bad actors. Phishing remains a top driver of breaches and fraud. Financial services are a prime target because email moves money, resets passwords, and confirms identity. Verizon’s 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report again lists social engineering and phishing among…

Read more
Certificates

New in Certificates Lite: Active certificate scanning and smarter expiry alerts

Francesca Rünger-Field

A quick recap Earlier this year, we launched Red Sift Certificates Lite, the free TLS certificate expiration monitoring service recommended by Let’s Encrypt. Since launch, thousands of organizations have adopted it to track their certificates and avoid expiry-related outages. What we heard from customers At launch, we had adopted Let’s Encrypt’s approach for consistency…

Read more
AI

Red Sift’s AI Agent, Part II: Optimization for accuracy and scale

Phong Nguyen

In our previous blog post, we introduced Red Sift’s AI Agent for lookalike classification – an intelligent system that determines whether a suspicious domain has been deliberately crafted to mimic a legitimate one or if the resemblance is merely coincidental. That post focused on the what and why of the solution: why rule-based automation…

Read more